The annual proxy for this electronic payment company had the following proposals:
- Proforma votes on directors, appointment of auditors, and “say-on-pay” advisory vote
- Shareholder proposals on:
-Human and indigenous rights
Magni voted as follows:
- Magni voted for and against the proforma proposals.
-For directors – The board has a majority of independent directors and some have CEO/CFO experience with other companies. The compensation of directors is disclosed with a meaningful portion in equity where the equity has restrictions to align director incentives with long-term value creation. The compensation levels are set using a benchmarking process.
-For auditors – There appear to be no controversies with the financial statements of the company.
-Against “say-on-pay” Advisory Vote and related compensation matters – The peer group used for benchmarking purposes was either not provided or well-hidden in the proxy materials.
- Magni voted for and against shareholder proposals.
-For proxy access – Shareholder engagement is an important part of good governance. Proposals on annual proxies are a way for shareholders to make sure the board understands shareholder expectations. Easy access encourages shareholder engagement. The cost of adding shareholder proposals is low. At the same time, the resulting vote count helps the board and management understand the breadth and depth of interest in the topic.
-For political transparency – The Paypal objection to the proposal did not address the question of transparency regarding what resources are currently provided for political activities. Transparency is foundational to good governance.
-Against human and indigenous rights – These rights are significant social issues. It is not clear what the shareholder really wants. Paypal already receives high scores in the Magni Corporate Governance Assessment.