The annual proxy for this power and energy company had the following proposals:
- Proforma votes on directors, appointment of auditors, and “say-on-pay” advisory vote
- Shareholder proposals on:
-Disclosure of methane emissions
Magni voted as follows:
- Magni voted for the proforma proposals.
–Directors. The board has a majority of independent directors and some have CEO/CFO experience with other companies. The compensation of directors is disclosed with a meaningful portion in equity where the equity has restrictions to align director incentives with long-term value creation. The compensation levels are set using a benchmarking process.
–Auditors. There appear to be no controversies with the financial statements of the company.
–“Say-on-pay” Advisory Vote. The proxy materials demonstrated that the board has more than considered shareholder feedback on executive compensation. In addition, the proxy materials disclosed the benchmarking done on executive compensation, including listing the peer group used in the benchmarking.
- Magni voted against the shareholder proposals.
-Written consent – Shareholders making a written consent proposal generally believe the capability would improve responsiveness to shareholders. Magni believes written consent, if enacted by a company, could be used in ways that are counter to shareholder best interests and hence inconsistent with corporate governance best practices. Simply put, written consent potentially provides an opaque process for a limited number of shareholders with a slight majority to make changes. Magni will soon post a research article defining the firm’s position on written consent.
-Disclosure of methane emissions – Dominion already produces a report. The report includes metrics and company actions. The shareholder proposal does not acknowledge the existing report, much less identify any deficiencies in that report. If the proposal had identified deficiencies or misrepresentations in the existing report, then Magni would have supported the proposal.